My Portfolio
Electrical Engineering · UT Knoxville

Neyland
Peterson

I am a first-year electrical engineering student in the Chancellor’s Honors and Cook Grand Challenge programs at the University of Tennessee, a Rocky Top Scholar, and a graduate of McCallie School. I enjoy hands on electrical engineering projects to help me further develop my understanding of what I have learned in classes.

Portrait of Neyland Peterson
McDonald, Tennessee

Selected Work

01

Prototype Rocket Design

Me and my team designed a rocket intended to pass Mach 1. I was responsible for the avionics, programming the accelerometer and altimeter to compare real flight data against simulation, and ensuring reliable recovery. I also 3D printed the nose cone and the motor chassis. OpenRocket put the G80 configuration at 453 m/s with an apogee near 984 m. We chose not to launch because the high-thrust motor paired with an airframe that was not strong enough made flight unsafe, which looking back was definitely the correct decision considering we were using three G-size motors on plastic bottles. I hope to launch something more regulated in the future.

453 m/s simulated (G80T-10)  ·  ~984 m simulated apogee

Accelerometer code testing
Finished rocket with clear payload bay and fins
Nose cone and payload section of the rocket
Rear of the rocket showing fins and motor mount
02

High-Performance 3D-Printed I-Beams

I designed and compared many I-beams, optimizing the cross-section for strength-to-weight rather than raw strength. I generated and simulated the versions in Fusion 360, which is where I picked up the basics of Fusion and CAD, and I experimented with AI-optimized I-beam designs alongside my own. Across three rounds of print-and-break testing I adjusted the web height, flange width, web thickness, and fillet radius, logged mass and failure load for each beam, and let the results guide the next design. The best beam reached 29.5 N/g.

To predict how a cross-section would perform before printing, I built a strength-to-weight calculator in Excel. It estimates the moment of inertia, weight, and strength-to-weight of the beam from its dimensions using a 3-point-bend model. It is a theoretical model, so it reads higher than the printed beams, which fail early at layer lines.

29.5 N/g best, tested  ·  2,441 N peak load  ·  3 test rounds

I-beam modeled in Fusion 360, isometric view
Modeled in Fusion 360
3-point bend test
Printed red I-beam labeled P1 on a workbench
Printed beam, P1
Two printed red I-beams labeled P3
Failure: the top flange broke off
Yellow printed I-beam bent and cracked after load testing
Tested to failure
03

Rocket-Engine Vibration Analysis

This was a guided project, and the data was given to me rather than something I collected. I worked through a Python notebook that analyzed accelerometer data from four static rocket-engine tests, three 3D-printed thrust structures and one held together with zip ties. My understanding of the deeper math is still at a surface level, but two ideas stuck with me the most.

The first is power spectral density, or PSD. Instead of looking at the raw shaking over time, a PSD breaks the signal into the range of frequencies it contains and shows how much energy sits at each one. Plotting all four tests together made it easy to compare how violent each one was: the gRMS value next to each test is a single number for its overall vibration, and Test C came out the highest at 1.61 g.

The second is the spectrogram, which puts time back in. It shows frequency on one axis and time on the other, with color for power, so you can actually watch events happen, like the engine igniting and the parachute charge firing, instead of averaging them away.

I also learned the basics of filtering. Before any of that analysis, the raw signal was run through a Butterworth high-pass filter to strip out low-frequency drift and electrical noise, which is what makes the real vibration readable in the first place.

Power spectral density comparison of the four rocket-engine tests with gRMS in the legend
Power spectral density of all four tests, with gRMS in the legend
04

Low-Cost Wind Tunnel

My partner and I built a low-cost wind tunnel because our school did not have one. It uses a variable-speed duct fan, a 3D-printed honeycomb straightener and mesh screen to condition the flow, a clear acrylic test section, and fog delivered through straws to make streamlines visible. We designed it so students could observe how their own parts interact with moving air and measure drag with a load cell rather than estimate it.

Early attempt to pass fog through the tunnel
3D-printed honeycomb straightener and mesh screen
Inside the test section with the stand and straws
Test object on the stand inside the tunnel
Hand-drawn wind tunnel layout and wiring diagram
05

Laser Audio Link

This was my first independent project. I modulated a laser with an audio signal, aimed it at a photodiode, and fed the recovered signal into an amplifier and speaker to play sound over light.

Audio playing back through the receiver
Breadboard prototype with Arduino, wiring, and laser module
Handheld laser transmitter module with the beam visible
Elegoo UNO board with the photodiode receiver module
Kinter two-channel amplifier wired to the receiver

Experience

05 / 2026 – Present

CAD Technician Intern

Mesa Associates, Inc. · Chattanooga, TN

As a CAD technician intern I edit and revise engineering drawings in AutoCAD, working from engineer markups and design changes to keep every deliverable aligned with TVA standards. This internship is where most of my CAD experience comes from, working in AutoCAD nearly every day. I go on-site for plant walkdowns to document existing conditions and verify equipment locations, and I build and maintain cable and conduit schedules so routing and sizing match the overall electrical design.

Project 1

Fish-Safe Cooling Water Intake Screens

One project I have worked on is redesigning cooling water intake screens to meet the EPA’s 316(b) guidelines, which require large water-withdrawing facilities to use the best available technology so that fish are not pinned against or pulled through the screens. The design is a traveling rotating screen: instead of holding fish against a fixed mesh, the screen slowly rotates, lifts any fish that reach it, and carries them up and around so they can be returned safely downstream. On the older screens smaller fish were still getting caught, so the engineers ran the intake-flow and screen-velocity calculations, and my job was to iterate the designs in CAD as changes came through and keep the drawing sets and documentation organized.

Intake structure with traveling water screens and circulation water pumps, annotated during a plant walkdown
Traveling water screens & circulation pumps
Interior of the intake structure showing the screens and flow to the powerhouse
Inside the intake structure

These photos are from a plant that was built a while back, not the specific plant I am working on now, since those drawings have not been constructed yet.

Skills

Technical

CAD Drafting (AutoCAD), Fusion 360, Arduino Programming, Python, Java

Additional

Mentorship, Risk Management, Event Coordination

Contact

Get in touch.

I am always glad to talk about any of these projects or about community-focused engineering.